Head Hunter

NRC meeting update

July 8th, 2010 by Tony Hansen.

Unfortunately we were unable to stream today's NRC meeting but I did want to give an update from info provided by Amy Spray, one of our policy staffers.

There were two issues of keen interest to Michigan hunters on the docket: antler restrictions in the TB area and the possible expansion of crossbow use in Michigan.


The antler point issue was up for action. The original proposal was to establish minimum antler point restrictions on all bucks in DMU 487 in an effort to put more focus on doe harvest in the area. The NRC did not feel that there was enough scientific evidence that such regulations would increase the doe kill in that area and instead Commissioner JR Richardson offered an amnendment that would implement the same regulations in place in the U.P. -- you can shoot one buck of your choice or two bucks, one of which must have three points on a side, the other four points on a side.

On the crossbow issue, the measure was up for discussion with action coming next month. There are three options on the table:

Option 1 would expand crossbow use in northern Michigan., Option 2 would maintain existing regulations and Option 3 would be full inclusion of crossbows throughout the state during all archery seasons. At this point, it's really anyone's guess as to where that one will end up.

So the August NRC meeting should be interesting -- and we will try to have the live stream going for that one but the location could hinder that.

Leave a Comment Comments (4)

Previous Comments

#1 from .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on July 10, 2010

Tony- Can you confirm that the Restriction for the combo was 4 pts on both tags? I was under the impression it was 3pts on one and 4 on the other.

#2 from .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on July 12, 2010

Apparently the NRC did not consider following their sunset requirement on the crossbow law nor the emergency resolution passed at 2010 convention stating to honor the 3 year sunste law before re-evaluating any crossbow issues? To remind everyone this issue was to be reviewed after three years of data were collected and analized. For whatever reason their seems to be a push to overstep this. I hope it is not because of political peer pressure.

#3 from .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on July 12, 2010

Yes—correct. It’s 3 on a side, 4 on a side. My apologies—I have edited the post to reflect that.

#4 from .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on July 20, 2010

Could someone please explain to me how this helps to solve the Bovine TB problem?  I’m stumped?

Add Your Comment

  • Great Deals on WhiteTail Products. Shop at the Marketplace.
  • Defend Your Rights. Join MUCC.
  • Sign up for Membership. Learn about all the great benefits.

Click here to get the News & Blogs Feed delivered to your RSS.